Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
A reduce court might not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it can be unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it might possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Also, it might review an appeal of the decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In the event the Commission cannot access a decision.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion entails a go to some higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, to the other hand, provides financial relief by putting an employee in a very higher spend scale, without shifting their career duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained during the same pay out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they deficiency possibilities for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Instrument used to reduce the hardship of long-term stagnation. Read more
Lots of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to perform away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
Only the written opinions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions in the reduce (trial) courts are usually not generally published or distributed.
500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every single and also the same check here shall be kept inside the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused into the petitioners. five. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in a very particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its individual list of binding case law. Subsequently, a judgment rendered from the Ninth Circuit will not be binding inside the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this style of law strives to condition our society, delivering rules and guidelines, it would be not possible for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.